Bob Marshall’s BLS Analysis; 1/4/13
December BLS Preface
TBMG News
To potential students: If you want to increase your income as a recruiter, all the details of my three coaching plans are available to you on my website: www.TheMarshallPlan.org or you can reach me at 770-898-5550 or bob@themarshallplan.org.
Preface
Many of you continue to correspond with me about these monthly BLS analyses and have asked if it is OK to use them in your presentations. The answer is, of course, yes! That is why I spend the time to write down this information. I would encourage any of you who have that desire to weave any of the information I have printed below into your presentations. I write these analyses for the benefit of our recruitment industry in general and for the members of my distribution list in particular. So use this info as you deem appropriate.
I also write these monthly BLS analyses to not only counterbalance the negative/incorrect press reporting of our general economic state but, more than that, to remind all of my recruitment readers that, at the level we work, there is no unemployment and so we must recruit to find the candidates our client companies so desperately need!
So to my recruiter colleagues, get out there and do what your name implies…RECRUIT. When your client companies have unique and difficult positions to fill, they need you. When they are being picky, they need you. When they are longing for more production from fewer employees, they need you. Go fill those needs. These should be the halcyon days in the recruitment arena!
Finally, always remember that we are not in an HR business, but in a ‘circumventing the time factor in the hiring sequence’ business—and adding value to our client companies.
Economy grew faster than expected in summer
Washington, December 20, 2012
The U.S. economy grew faster than previously estimated in the third quarter as exports and government spending provided a lift, but that boost is likely to be lost amid slowing global demand and a move towards tighter fiscal policy.
Gross domestic product expanded at a 3.1% annual rate, the Commerce Department said in its third estimate, revised up from the 2.7% pace reported last month.
It was the fastest growth since late 2011 and also reflected a slightly better pace of consumer spending than previously estimated.
Economists polled by Reuters had expected GDP growth would be raised to a 2.8% pace. Exports grew at a 1.9% rate, rather than 1.1%.
With imports falling for the first time since the second quarter of 2009, that narrowed the trade deficit. Trade contributed 0.38 percentage point to GDP growth. The drop in imports is a sign of weak domestic demand.
Government spending was revised to a 3.9% growth rate, from 3.5%, boosted by a rebound in state and local government outlays. It added three quarters of a percentage point to GDP growth in the third quarter.
The boost from exports is likely to be short-lived against the backdrop of a cooling global economy. Government will likely be a drag in the coming quarters amid belt tightening to trim the budget deficits.
While growth in consumer spending, which accounts for about 70% of U.S. economic activity, was raised by 0.2 percentage point to a 1.6% rate, that mostly reflected higher health care costs.
Business inventories were trimmed to $60.3 billion from $61.3 billion. Restocking by businesses contributed 0.73 percentage point to GDP growth.
Given the sluggish spending pace, some of the inventory accumulation might have been unplanned, suggesting businesses will need to liquidate stocks this quarter because of weak demand.
Excluding inventories, GDP rose at a revised 2.4% rate. Final sales of goods and services produced in the United States had been previously estimated to have increased at a 1.9% pace.
US – ManpowerGroup Survey: U.S. Hiring Trends Up
December 11, 2012
U. S. employers expect increased hiring in the first quarter compared to the same period a year ago, according to the first-quarter 2013 Manpower employment outlook Survey released today by ManpowerGroup, Inc. The outlook is the strongest first-quarter data collected since 2008, and is significantly stronger than the weakest first quarter outlook in the history of the survey, reported in 2010.
“The exciting news is that the outlook has been stable or shown positive growth for 15 months,” said Melanie Holmes, a vice president at ManpowerGroup.
Among U.S. employers surveyed, 17% expect to add to their workforces and 8% expect a decline in payrolls during first quarter 2013. 72% of employers anticipate making no change to staff levels and the remaining 3% are undecided about hiring plans in the first quarter. This results in a net employment outlook of 9%, or 12% on a seasonally adjusted basis.
“The outlook has shown no setbacks over the last 15 quarters, which reflects an ongoing state of rebuilding as employers learn to function within a state of volatility,” said Jonas Prising, ManpowerGroup president. “Over the past few years, we have seen continued incremental growth in hiring projections, which reinforces this job growth, is slow but sustained.”
ManpowerGroup’s employment outlook survey includes responses from more than 18,000 U.S. employers. This quarter’s survey was conducted prior to Hurricane Sandy. Therefore, the data does not reflect the storm’s impact on anticipated hiring decisions.
In Canada, the seasonally adjusted net employment outlook is 13%, a slight increase when compared to the outlook reported in the previous quarter. This outlook is also a one percentage point drop from the Outlook reported during the same time last year.
“Canada is a little stronger than we are,” said Holmes. “Canada’s outlook represents a continued steady trend that we expect to remain favorable.”
13% of the more than 1,900 Canadian employers surveyed, plan to increase their payrolls in the first quarter of 2013, while 7% anticipate cutbacks. Of employers surveyed, 78% expect to maintain current staffing levels while 2% are unsure of their hiring intentions for the upcoming quarter.
“Job seekers in all regions, except Quebec, are likely to benefit from a hopeful hiring climate from January through March, with employers in Western Canada and the Maritimes reporting the most positive outlook,” said Byrne Luft, vice president of operations, for Manpower Canada. “With regional outlooks experiencing slight increases compared to the previous quarter, job seekers should maintain confidence in the labor market as employers throughout Canada anticipate the hiring pace will remain steady through the winter. Most of the new jobs created in Canada this year have been full-time positions. This continuation of the trend toward full-time employment is an encouraging sign.”
Report: 1,700,000 Cloud Jobs Unfilled
Daily News, December 19 2012
Information technology hiring managers couldn’t fill an existing 1.7 million open cloud computing-related positions in 2012, according to a new report by Microsoft and market intelligence firm IDC. The reason was lack of training and certification to work in a cloud-enabled world.
The report also found that demand for cloud-ready IT workers will grow by 26% annually through 2015.
“Despite modest growth of the IT sector overall in the U.S., cloud-ready jobs are increasing as we head into 2013, but with this increase comes the harsh reality that workforces around the world are steps behind when it comes to attaining the skills necessary to thrive in the cloud computing industry,” said Cushing Anderson, program vice president, IDC. “Unlike IT skill shortages in the past, solving this skills gap is extremely challenging, given that cloud brings a new set of skills, which haven’t been needed in the past. There is no one-size-fits-all set of criteria for jobs in cloud computing. Therefore, training and certification is essential for preparing prospective job candidates to work in cloud-related jobs.”
The new ADP/Moody’s Report
Released, January 3, 2013
Private sector employment increased by 215,000 jobs from November to December, according to the December ADP National Employment Report®, which is produced by Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP®), a leading provider of human capital management solutions, in collaboration with Moody’s Analytics. The report, which is derived from ADP’s actual payroll data, measures the change in total nonfarm private employment each month on a seasonally-adjusted basis. The November 2012 report, which reported job gains of 118,000, was revised upward by 30,000 to 148,000 jobs.
By Company Size
Small businesses: 25,000
1-19 employees -6,000
20-49 employees 31,000
Medium businesses: 102,000
50-499 employees 102,000
Large businesses: 87,000
500-999 employees 26,000
1,000+ employees 61,000
By Sector
Goods producing 28,000
Service providing 187,000
Industry Snapshot
Construction 39,000
Manufacturing -11,000
Trade/transportation/utilities 53,000
Financial activities 14,000
Professional/business services 37,000
Goods-producing employment rose by 28,000 jobs in December as a large gain in construction jobs of 39,000 more than offset the 11,000 decline in manufacturing employment.
Service-providing jobs increased by 187,000. Among the service industries trade/transportation/utilities services had the largest gain with 53,000 jobs added over the month. Professional/business services added 37,000 jobs and financial activities added 14,000 jobs in December.
Carlos A. Rodriguez, president and chief executive officer of ADP, said, “During the final month of 2012, U.S. private sector employment ended the year on a positive note as 215,000 jobs were added – the ADP National Employment Report’s largest monthly gain since February 2012. During the past year, the private sector added a total of more than 1.7 million jobs.”
Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, said, “The job market held firm in December despite the intensifying fiscal cliff negotiations in Washington. Businesses even became somewhat more aggressive in their hiring at year end. Most encouraging is the revival in construction jobs, although the December gain was likely lifted by rebuilding after Superstorm Sandy. The job market ended 2012 on a more solid footing.”
(The January 2013 ADP National Employment Report will be released at 8:15 a.m. ET on January 30, 2013).
ADP Small Business Report®:
Due to the important contribution that small businesses make to economic growth, employment data that are specific to businesses with 49 or fewer employees is reported in the ADP Small Business Report® each month. The ADP Small Business Report is a subset of the ADP National Employment Report.
December Small Business Highlights*
By Size:
1-19 employees -6,000
20-49 employees 31,000
By Sector for 1 – 49 Employees:
Goods producing 7,000
Service providing 18,000
By Sector for 1-19 employees:
Goods producing 2,000
Service providing -8,000
By Sector for 20-49 employees:
Goods producing 5,000
Service providing 26,000
* Sum of components may not equal total, due to rounding.
Bottom-line: To my audience of recruiters, always remember this: Our ‘bread and butter’, especially on the contingency side of the house, has historically been, and continues to be, small and medium-sized client companies. Along with the large companies, these companies need to be in included in your niche!
Job Openings and Structural Unemployment
On December 11th, the BLS reported that there were 3,700,000 job openings on the last business day of October, up from the 3.6 million job openings in August and September. (The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey results for November 2012 are scheduled to be released on Thursday, January 10, 2013). The 3,700,000 reflects published openings comprised of jobs that are advertised either online or in print format.
As we recruiters know, that 3,700,000 number only represents 20% of the jobs currently available in the marketplace. The other 80% of job openings are unpublished and are filled through networking or word of mouth or by using a RECRUITER. So, those 3,700,000 published job openings now become a total of 18,500,000 published and hidden job orders.
In December there were 12,206,000 unemployed workers. What was the main reason why those job openings were open? Two Words: Structural Unemployment. If we can’t figure out how to educate and/or reeducate those 12,206,000 unemployed, then they will keep reappearing each month as a BLS unemployment statistic—as they have. In the meantime, our recruitment marketplace flourishes!
Online Labor Demand Shows Strong Increases, up 217,900 in December
- The average monthly rise in 2012 was 51,000
- In spite of the substantial 217,900 December gain, job demand weakened in the 2nd half of 2012
- Northeast region posts largest December gains after “hurricane effect” declines in November
- The New York metro area up 38,400 in December
Online advertised vacancies rose 217,900 in December to 4,937,800, according to The Conference Board Help Wanted OnLine® (HWOL) Data Series released January 2, 2013. The Supply/Demand rate stands at 2.6 unemployed for every vacancy. In November, there were 7.3 million more unemployed than the number of advertised vacancies, down from 11.8 million at the end of the recession in June 2009.
“Labor demand rose across the nation in December, with the largest gain in the Northeast,” said June Shelp, Vice President at The Conference Board. “The Northeast gain of 75,000 was good news after the drop in ads last month from the effects of Hurricane Sandy that impacted states from Virginia to Massachusetts. All in all, 2012 and 2011 ended with the same average monthly gain of about 50,000, with the first six months of the year significantly stronger than the last half.
The December BLS Analysis
The unemployment rate is published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a division of the US Department of Labor. The rate is found by dividing the number of unemployed by the total civilian labor force. On January 4th, 2012, the BLS published the most recent unemployment rate for December, 2012 of 7.8% (actually it is 7.849%, up .103% from 7.746% , as originally reported in November, 2012—or up .096 from 7.753% as just revised for November). Either way, we have a .1% increase in our unemployment rate from November to December, 2012.
The unemployment rate was determined by dividing the unemployed of 12,206,000—up from the month before by 164,000 (revised)—since December, 2011 (one year ago), this number has decreased by 843,000) by the total civilian labor force of 155,511,000 (up by 192,000 from November, 2012). Since December 2011, our total civilian labor force has increased by 1,566,000 people.
(The continuing ‘Strange BLS Math’ saga): The BLS continues to increase the total Civilian Working Population—this time up to 244,350,000; up from November by 176,000; up from October by 191,000; up from September by 211,000, up from August by 206,000; up from July by 212,000; up from June by 199,000; up from May by 189,000; up from April by 182,000; up from March by 180,000; up from February by 169,000; up from January by 335,000; and up from last December by 2,020,000. And this month they have slightly increased the Civilian Labor Force to 155,511,000 (up from November—revised—by 192,000).
Subtract the second number from the first number and you get 88,839,000 ‘Not in Labor Force’. That is a slight decrease of 16,000 (revised) ‘Not in Labor Force” in one month’s time. Since December 2011, 2,199,000 US workers have vanished! Where did those 2,199,000 potential workers disappear to? That’s approximately 7% of the entire US population of 315,108,773. I am assuming they still have to eat and pay their rent. They still need money, don’t they?
Our Employment Participation Rate—the population 16 years and older working or seeking work—remains at 63.6% (.1% higher than August’s historic low level of 63.5%). One year ago, our Participation Rate in December was 64.0%.
Final take on these numbers: Fewer people looking for work will always bring down the unemployment rate.
Anyway, back to the point I am trying to make. On the surface, these new unemployment rates are scary, but let’s look a little deeper and consider some other numbers.
The unemployment rate includes all types of workers—construction workers, government workers, etc. We recruiters, on the other hand, mainly place management, professional and related types of workers. That unemployment rate in December rose sharply to 3.9% (this rate is up from last month’s 3.6%). Or, you can look at it another way. We usually place people who have college degrees. That unemployment rate in December rose to 3.9% (up from last month’s 3.8%).
Now stay with me a little longer. This gets better. It’s important to understand (and none of the pundits mention this) that the unemployment rate, for many reasons, will never be 0%, no matter how good the economy is. Without boring you any more than I have already, let me add here that Milton Friedman (the renowned Nobel Prize-winning economist), is famous for the theory of the “natural rate of unemployment” (or the term he preferred, NAIRU, which is the acronym for Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment). Basically, this theory states that full employment presupposes an ‘unavoidable and acceptable’ unemployment rate of somewhere between 4-6% with it. Economists often settle on 5%, although the “New Normal Unemployment Rate” has been suggested to fall at 6.7%.
Nevertheless (if you will allow me to apply a ‘macro’ concept to a ‘micro’ issue), if this rate is applied to our main category of Management, Professional and Related types of potential recruits, and/or our other main category of College-Degreed potential recruits, we find no unemployment! None! Zilch!
THE IMPORTANCE OF GDP
“The economic goal of any nation, as of any individual, is to get the greatest results with the least effort. The whole economic progress of mankind has consisted in getting more production with the same labor…Translated into national terms, this first principle means that our real objective is to maximize production. In doing this, full employment—that is, the absence of involuntary idleness—becomes a necessary by-product. But production is the end, employment merely the means. We cannot continuously have the fullest production without full employment. But we can very easily have full employment without full production.”
—Economics in One Lesson, by Henry Hazlitt, Chapter X, “The Fetish of Full Employment”
On December 20th, the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced that the “third, and final” estimate of our real gross domestic product (GDP) – the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States – increased at an annual rate of 3.1% in the third quarter of 2012 (that is from the second quarter to the third quarter). In the second quarter, real GDP increased 1.3%. And in the first quarter, real GDP increased 2.0%. The economy needs to expand at about 3% just to keep the unemployment rate from rising.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR UNEMPLOYMENT EVER TO BE ZERO
‘Unemployment’ is an emotional ‘trigger’ word. It conjures up negative thoughts. But it is important to realize that, while we want everyone who wants a job to have the opportunity to work, unemployment can never be zero and, in fact, can be disruptive to an economy if it gets too close to zero. Very low unemployment can actually hurt the economy by creating an upward pressure on wages which invariably leads to higher production costs and prices. This can lead to inflation. The lowest the unemployment rate has been in the US was 2.5%. That was in May and June 1953 when the economy overheated due to the Korean War. When this bubble burst, it kicked off the Recession of 1953. A healthy economy will always include some percentage of unemployment.
There are five main sources of unemployment:
1. Cyclical (or demand-deficient) unemployment – This type of unemployment fluctuates with the business cycle. It rises during a recession and falls during the subsequent recovery. Workers who are most affected by this type of unemployment are laid off during a recession when production volumes fall and companies use lay-offs as the easiest way to reduce costs. These workers are usually rehired, some months later, when the economy improves.
2. Frictional unemployment – This comes from the normal turnover in the labor force. This is where new workers are entering the workforce and older workers are retiring and leaving vacancies to be filled by the new workers or those re-entering the workforce. This category includes workers who are between jobs.
3. Structural unemployment – This happens when the skills possessed by the unemployed worker don’t match the requirements of the opening—whether those be in characteristics and skills or in location. This can come from new technology or foreign competition (e.g., foreign outsourcing). This type of unemployment usually lasts longer than frictional unemployment because retraining, and sometimes relocation, is involved. Occasionally jobs in this category can just disappear overseas.
4. Seasonal unemployment – This happens when the workforce is affected by the climate or time of year. Construction workers and agricultural workers aren’t needed as much during the winter season because of the inclement weather. On the other hand, retail workers experience an increase in hiring shortly before, and during, the holiday season, but can be laid off shortly thereafter.
5. Surplus unemployment – This is caused by minimum wage laws and unions. When wages are set at a higher level, unemployment can often result. Why? To keep within the same payroll budget, the company must let go of some workers to pay the remaining workers a higher salary.
Other factors influencing the unemployment rate:
1. Length of unemployment – Some studies indicate that an important factor influencing a workers decision to accept a new job is directly related to the length of the unemployment benefit they are receiving. Just recently the government re-extended the eligibility for unemployment benefits from 26 weeks to as much as 73 weeks. Studies suggest that this reduces the incentive of the unemployed to seek and accept less desirable jobs.
2. Changes in GDP – Since hiring workers takes time, the improvement in the unemployment rate usually lags behind the improvement in the GDP.
WHERE RECRUITERS PLACE
Now back to the issue at hand, namely the recruiting, and placing, of professionals and those with college degrees.
If you take a look at the past few years of unemployment in the December “management, professional and related” types of worker category, you will find the following rates:
December 2011 4.2%
December 2010 4.6%
December 2009 4.6%
December 2008 3.3%
December 2007 2.0%
December 2006 1.7%
December 2005 2.0%
December 2004 2.5%
December 2003 2.8%
December 2002 2.8%
Here are the rates, during those same time periods, for “college-degreed” workers:
December 2011 4.1%
December 2010 4.8%
December 2009 5.0%
December 2008 3.7%
December 2007 2.2%
December 2006 1.9%
December 2005 2.2%
December 2004 2.5%
December 2003 3.0%
December 2002 2.9%
So, while December’s 2012 rates for these two categories, at 3.9% and 3.9% respectively, are trending positively, when looking at the big picture, it’s not anything to be very happy about either—especially when we see how well we had it during the 2002-2008 time frame. But regardless, these unemployment numbers usually include a good number of job hoppers, job shoppers and rejects. We, on the other hand, are engaged by our client companies to find those candidates who are happy, well-appreciated, making good money and currently working and we entice them to move for even better opportunities—especially where new technologies are expanding. This will never change. And that is why, no matter the unemployment rate, we still need to market to find the best job orders and we still need to recruit to find the best candidates.
Below are the numbers for the over 25 year olds:
Less that H.S. diploma – Unemployment Rate
|
12/08 |
|
10.9% |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
12.0% |
12.6% |
13.3% |
14.8% |
15.5% |
15.5% |
15.4% |
15.6% |
15.0% |
15.5% |
15.0% |
15.3% |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
15.2% |
15.6% |
14.5% |
14.7% |
15.0% |
14.1% |
13.8% |
14.0% |
15.4% |
15.3% |
15.7% |
15.3% |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
14.2% |
13.9% |
13.7% |
14.6% |
14.7% |
14.3% |
15.0% |
14.3% |
14.0% |
13.8% |
13.2% |
13.8% |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
13.1% |
12.9% |
12.6% |
12.5% |
13.0% |
12.6% |
12.7% |
12.0% |
11.3% |
12.2% |
12.2% |
11.7% |
H.S. Grad; no college – Unemployment Rate
|
12/08 |
|
7.7% |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
8.1% |
8.3% |
9.0% |
9.3% |
10.0% |
9.8% |
9.4% |
9.7% |
10.8% |
11.2% |
10.4% |
10.5% |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
10.1% |
10.5% |
10.8% |
10.6% |
10.9% |
10.8% |
10.1% |
10.3% |
10.0% |
10.1% |
10.0% |
9.8% |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
9.4% |
9.5% |
9.5% |
9.7% |
9.5% |
10.0% |
9.3% |
9.6% |
9.7% |
9.6% |
8.8% |
8.7% |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
8.4% |
8.3% |
8.0% |
7.9% |
8.1% |
8.4% |
8.7% |
8.8% |
8.7% |
8.4% |
8.1% |
8.0% |
Some College; or AA/AS – Unemployment Rate
|
12/08 |
|
5.6% |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
6.2% |
7.0% |
7.2% |
7.4% |
7.7% |
8.0% |
7.9% |
8.2% |
8.5% |
9.0% |
9.0% |
9.0% |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
8.5% |
8.0% |
8.2% |
8.3% |
8.3% |
8.2% |
8.3% |
8.7% |
9.1% |
8.5% |
8.7% |
8.1% |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
8.0% |
7.8% |
7.4% |
7.5% |
8.0% |
8.4% |
8.3% |
8.2% |
8.4% |
8.3% |
7.6% |
7.7% |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
7.2% |
7.3% |
7.5% |
7.6% |
7.9% |
7.5% |
7.1% |
6.6% |
6.5% |
6.9% |
6.6% |
6.9% |
BS/BS + – Unemployment Rate
|
12/08 |
|
3.7% |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
3.8% |
4.1% |
4.3% |
4.4% |
4.8% |
4.7% |
4.7% |
4.7% |
4.9% |
4.7% |
4.9% |
5.0% |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
4.9% |
5.0% |
4.9% |
4.9% |
4.7% |
4.4% |
4.5% |
4.6% |
4.4% |
4.7% |
5.1% |
4.8% |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
4.2% |
4.3% |
4.4% |
4.5% |
4.5% |
4.4% |
4.3% |
4.3% |
4.2% |
4.4% |
4.4% |
4.1% |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
4.2% |
4.2% |
4.2% |
4.0% |
3.9% |
4.1% |
4.1% |
4.1% |
4.1% |
3.8% |
3.8% |
3.9% |
Management, Professional & Related – Unemployment Rate
|
12/08 |
|
3.3% |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
4.1% |
3.9% |
4.2% |
4.0% |
4.6% |
5.0% |
5.5% |
5.4% |
5.2% |
4.7% |
4.6% |
4.6% |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
5.0% |
4.8% |
4.7% |
4.5% |
4.5% |
4.9% |
5.0% |
5.1% |
4.4% |
4.5% |
4.7% |
4.6% |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
4.7% |
4.4% |
4.3% |
4.0% |
4.4% |
4.7% |
5.0% |
4.9% |
4.4% |
4.4% |
4.2% |
4.2% |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
4.3% |
4.2% |
4.2% |
3.7% |
4.0% |
4.4% |
4.8% |
4.5% |
3.9% |
3.8% |
3.6% |
3.9% |
Or employed…(,000)
|
12/08 |
|
52,548 |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
52,358 |
52,196 |
52,345 |
52,597 |
52,256 |
51,776 |
51,810 |
51,724 |
52,186 |
52,981 |
52,263 |
52,131 |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
52,159 |
52,324 |
52,163 |
52,355 |
51,839 |
51,414 |
50,974 |
50,879 |
51,757 |
51,818 |
52,263 |
51,704 |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
51,866 |
52,557 |
53,243 |
53,216 |
52,778 |
52,120 |
51,662 |
51,997 |
52,665 |
52,864 |
52,787 |
52,808 |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
53,152 |
53,208 |
53,771 |
54,055 |
54,156 |
53,846 |
53,165 |
53,696 |
54,655 |
55,223 |
54,951 |
54,635 |
And unemployed…(,000)
|
12/08 |
|
1,802 |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
2,238 |
2,137 |
2,292 |
2,164 |
2,373 |
2,720 |
3,034 |
2,925 |
2,859 |
2,593 |
2,530 |
2,509 |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
2,762 |
2,637 |
2,600 |
2,464 |
2,450 |
2,644 |
2,687 |
2,762 |
2,381 |
2,417 |
2,525 |
2,468 |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
2,557 |
2,435 |
2,381 |
2,196 |
2,419 |
2,598 |
2,742 |
2,671 |
2,450 |
2,410 |
2,336 |
2,303 |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
2,410 |
2,336 |
2,330 |
2,062 |
2,275 |
2,472 |
2,666 |
2,556 |
2,245 |
2,170 |
2,077 |
2,221 |
For a total Management, Professional & Related workforce of…(,000)
|
12/08 |
|
54,350 |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
54,596 |
54,333 |
54,637 |
54,761 |
54,629 |
54,496 |
54,844 |
54,649 |
55,045 |
55,574 |
54,793 |
54,640 |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
54,921 |
54,961 |
54,763 |
54,819 |
54,289 |
54,058 |
53,661 |
53,641 |
54,138 |
54,235 |
54,788 |
54,172 |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
54,423 |
54,992 |
55,624 |
55,412 |
55,197 |
54,718 |
54,404 |
54,668 |
55,115 |
55,274 |
55,123 |
55,111 |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
55,562 |
55,544 |
56,101 |
56,117 |
56,431 |
56,318 |
55,831 |
56,252 |
56,900 |
57,393 |
57,028 |
56,856 |
Management, Business and Financial Operations – Unemployment Rate
|
12/08 |
|
3.9% |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
4.6% |
4.5% |
4.5% |
4.4% |
4.6% |
4.8% |
4.9% |
5.0% |
5.2% |
5.4% |
5.4% |
5.2% |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
5.2% |
5.1% |
5.4% |
5.1% |
4.9% |
4.8% |
4.7% |
4.9% |
4.3% |
5.0% |
5.5% |
5.7% |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
5.3% |
4.9% |
4.8% |
4.6% |
4.9% |
4.6% |
4.6% |
4.6% |
4.6% |
4.7% |
4.6% |
4.4% |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
4.5% |
4.4% |
4.4% |
4.0% |
4.1% |
3.8% |
3.8% |
3.7% |
3.5% |
3.6% |
3.8% |
4.1% |
Professional & Related – Unemployment Rate
|
12/08 |
|
2.9% |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
3.7% |
3.5% |
3.9% |
3.6% |
4.2% |
5.1% |
6.0% |
5.6% |
5.2% |
4.2% |
4.1% |
4.2% |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
4.9% |
4.6% |
4.3% |
4.1% |
4.3% |
5.0% |
5.2% |
5.3% |
4.4% |
4.1% |
4.1% |
3.8% |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
4.3% |
4.1% |
3.9% |
3.5% |
4.0% |
4.9% |
5.3% |
5.1% |
4.4% |
4.1% |
4.0% |
4.0% |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
4.2% |
4.1% |
4.0% |
3.5% |
4.0% |
4.8% |
5.5% |
5.2% |
4.3% |
3.9% |
3.5% |
3.8% |
Sales & Related – Unemployment Rate
|
12/08 |
|
7.0% |
|
1/09 |
2/09 |
3/09 |
4/09 |
5/09 |
6/09 |
7/09 |
8/09 |
9/09 |
10/09 |
11/09 |
12/09 |
|
7.7% |
8.4% |
8.9% |
8.6% |
8.9% |
9.1% |
8.3% |
8.7% |
8.9% |
9.5% |
9.1% |
8.9% |
|
1/10 |
2/10 |
3/10 |
4/10 |
5/10 |
6/10 |
7/10 |
8/10 |
9/10 |
10/10 |
11/10 |
12/10 |
|
10.1% |
10.2% |
9.7% |
9.2% |
9.6% |
9.4% |
10.1% |
9.0% |
9.4% |
9.1% |
8.8% |
8.3% |
|
1/11 |
2/11 |
3/11 |
4/11 |
5/11 |
6/11 |
7/11 |
8/11 |
9/11 |
10/11 |
11/11 |
12/11 |
|
9.3% |
9.0% |
8.5% |
8.5% |
9.4% |
9.7% |
9.4% |
8.6% |
9.4% |
8.2% |
7.8% |
7.7% |
|
1/12 |
2/12 |
3/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
6/12 |
7/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
10/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
|
8.2% |
7.9% |
8.1% |
7.6% |
7.9% |
8.4% |
8.3% |
8.6% |
7.9% |
7.0% |
7.3% |
7.0% |